Scientists tell us as the universe expanded from the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was in the millions of degrees in temperature. Obviously too hot for any organic matter (life). Only inorganic matter could be within the universe. Over time as temperatures cooled, gaseous matter formed the sphere rock formations (planets and moons) that we observe throughout the universe. The universe then was totally sterile. In photos of the Moon and Mars we observe there is no life, not even one insect or one blade of grass there, just inorganic matter (elements, compounds, rocks).

As you know a highly complex DNA code is in every living cell and is unique for every life form. DNA codes are far more complex and intelligent than any software program ever produced.

In order for something to be considered science, it must be observable and replicable. Because inorganic matter has zero capability to perform any task and no one has ever observed inorganic matter producing DNA codes for any cell of any evolving life form, evolution no longer can be considered science for the “Origin of Species.” So we are left with having faith in people who tell us stories about evolution vs. faith in people who tell us about our Intelligent Designer. Which is more rational and offers us a greater benefit ... the incivility and depression that results from telling people they came from monkeys or the prosperity nations received during times of Christian renascence? History teaches us the pattern of corruption, intolerance and mass murder by atheist governments. History also teaches us of integrity, freedom and human advancement during times of true Christian renascence the rare times countries lived in obedience to the teachings of the Bible.

Now let’s consider a common machine, the automobile. Each component of an automobile is engineered to very precise specifications by teams of intelligent engineers. Let's think about just the fluids in an automobile. They too are engineered to precise properties. What would happen if we were to ask a person, without any experience, to simply install all the different fluids in an automobile? People are capable, intelligent and have a desire to succeed. But the chances of a person simply installing all the fluids (brake fluid, transmission fluid, engine coolant, Freon, differential oil, engine oil, gasoline, battery acid, etc.) in the right place in the correct amount is near zero. Just that very simple task alone makes random chance of the function of an automobile impossible.

But the fluids required for the function of the human body are far more complex than the fluids in automobiles, such as: blood in the veins, stomach acid in the stomach, tear fluid in the eyes and synovial fluid in the joints. It's apparent these fluids were intelligently designed. Plus the fluids in the human body replenish on their own and to correct levels, unlike a car. This sophistication alone makes random chance of the function of a human body impossible.

Lastly let's look at two of the most proven laws in science, the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The First Law of Thermodynamics states that matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed. The Second Law states that everything always tends to move from order to disorder. These tell us that if we set a brick in a field and check on it 1000 years later, we will not find that it evolved into a house, but deteriorated into dust.

Evolution is based on the unscientific rationale that mutations are good and beneficial. But when we observe mutations, we call them birth defects. Parents do not want a mutation in their child because mutations result in cleft palates, clubfoot, downs syndrome and more ... not improvements as the Second Law proves.

Evolution is an infinitely imaginative branch of science. No one has seen evidence for it. I know because I travelled much in search of evidence for evolution. I have been to some of the largest museums of natural history in the world: New York, Chicago, Manila Philippines, San Diego, Rosenheim Germany, the Smithsonian in Washington DC and more. Each display is similar, 100% of the displays are "casts" (fake pieces) or fragments of a skeleton. Notes posted next to displays are based on numerous assumptions which are based on the assumption of evolution, not scientific evidence. They do not have one complete skeleton of one link in the human chain of evolution! I ask at the museums for the evidence and am repeatedly told, "What you see is all we have to offer."

Do yourself a favor and see for yourself. Investigating the reasoning supporting evolution and intelligent design is one of the best things I ever did to build my faith in God. Click here to see how incomplete the most complete early hominid specimen is. It is difficult to tell if it is human, and don't be surprised if it eventually is proven not human. That happens far more often than evolutionists admit.

Now that we have established intelligent design is far more rational than static time and mindless random chance creating all the mass, space, energy and complexity throughout the universe, the big question is who is the Creator of all this sophistication? Does He have any requirements of us? Will He hold us accountable? This is what atheists want to keep us from thinking! That is so wrong!

Evolution and atheism are religions that have no scientific basis and require too much blind faith to be rational. There's no benefit to society to teach children God doesn't exist, we evolved from monkeys and we simply turn into dust and cease to exist. That's very depressing and causes many of the societal problems we see around this depressed world. Evolutionists/atheists would rather you look to them for the all the answers so they get respect, power and money!