Scientists tell us as the universe expanded from the
Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was in the
millions of degrees in temperature. Obviously too hot
for any organic matter (life). Only inorganic matter could be within
the universe. Over time as temperatures cooled,
gaseous matter formed the sphere rock formations
(planets and moons) that we observe
throughout the universe. The universe then was totally
sterile. In photos of the Moon and Mars we
observe there is no life, not even one insect or one blade
of grass there, just inorganic matter (elements,
As you know a highly complex DNA code is in every
living cell and is unique for every life form. DNA codes are
far more complex and intelligent than any software
program ever produced.
In order for
something to be considered science, it must be
observable and replicable. Because inorganic matter
has zero capability to perform any task and no one has ever
observed inorganic matter producing DNA codes for
any cell of any evolving life form, evolution no longer can be
considered science for the “Origin of Species.”
So we are left with having faith in people who tell us
about evolution vs. faith in people
tell us about our Intelligent Designer.
Which is more rational and offers us a greater benefit
... the incivility and depression that
results from telling people they came from monkeys or
the prosperity nations received during times of
Christian renascence? History teaches us the pattern
of corruption, intolerance and mass murder by atheist governments.
History also teaches us of
during times of true Christian renascence the rare
times countries lived in obedience to the teachings of
Now let’s consider a common machine, the
automobile. Each component of an
automobile is engineered to
very precise specifications by teams of intelligent
engineers. Let's think about just the fluids in an
automobile. They too are engineered to precise properties. What would happen if we were to
ask a person, without any experience, to simply install all the different fluids
in an automobile? People are capable, intelligent and
have a desire to
succeed. But the chances of a person simply
installing all the
transmission fluid, engine coolant,
acid, etc.) in the right place in the correct amount
is near zero. Just that very simple task alone makes
random chance of the function of an automobile
But the fluids required for the function of the human
are far more complex than the fluids in automobiles, such
as: blood in the veins, stomach acid in the stomach,
tear fluid in the eyes and synovial fluid in the
joints. It's apparent these fluids were intelligently
designed. Plus the fluids in the human body replenish on their own
unlike a car. This sophistication alone makes random
chance of the function of a human body impossible.
Lastly let's look at two of the most proven laws
science, the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
The First Law of Thermodynamics states that matter and
energy cannot be created nor destroyed. The Second Law
states that everything always tends to move from order
to disorder. These tell us that if we set a brick in a
field and check on it 1000 years later, we will not
find that it evolved into a house, but
deteriorated into dust.
Evolution is based on
the unscientific rationale that mutations are good
and beneficial. But when we observe mutations, we call
them birth defects. Parents do not want a mutation in
their child because mutations result in cleft palates,
clubfoot, downs syndrome and more ... not
improvements as the Second Law proves.
is an infinitely imaginative branch of science.
No one has seen evidence for it. I know because I travelled much in
search of evidence for evolution. I have been to some
of the largest museums of natural history in the
world: New York, Chicago, Manila
Philippines, San Diego, Rosenheim Germany, the
Smithsonian in Washington DC and more. Each display is
similar, 100% of the displays are "casts" (fake
pieces) or fragments of a skeleton. Notes
posted next to displays are based on numerous assumptions which are based on
the assumption of evolution, not
scientific evidence. They do not have one complete skeleton of one
link in the human chain of evolution! I ask at the
museums for the evidence and am repeatedly told, "What
you see is all
we have to offer."
Do yourself a favor and see for yourself.
Investigating the reasoning supporting evolution and
intelligent design is one of the best things I ever
did to build my faith in God.
how incomplete the most complete early hominid
specimen is. It is difficult to tell if it is human,
and don't be surprised if it eventually is proven not
human. That happens far more often than
Now that we have established intelligent design
is far more rational than static time and mindless random chance
creating all the mass, space, energy and complexity throughout the universe,
the big question is who is the Creator of all this
sophistication? Does He have any requirements of us?
Will He hold us accountable? This is what atheists
want to keep us from thinking! That is so wrong!
Evolution and atheism are religions that have no
scientific basis and require too much blind
faith to be rational.
There's no benefit to society to teach children God
doesn't exist, we evolved from monkeys and we simply turn into dust and cease to
exist. That's very depressing and causes many of the
societal problems we see around this depressed world.
Evolutionists/atheists would rather you look to them for the all the answers so they get respect,
power and money!
Learn more about our Creator and humanity at
www.HowToGetRightWithGod.com. Feel free to pass
this information onto others.
A plethora of censored information proving intelligent
design can be found at:
Institute for Creation Research,
Answers to tough creation
Answers in Genesis,
Answers to tough creation questions
Answers in Genesis, YouTube Channel